These pages shows a essay that is whole an example of how to structure your content

Example essay that is academic

Example academic essay: The Death Penalty. This essay shows many important features which commonly appear in essays.

Should the death penalty be restored in the united kingdom?

The restoration associated with death penalty for serious crimes is an issue of debate in the united kingdom due to the recent boost in violent crime. The causes, effects and approaches to the problems of violent crime throw up a number of complex issues which are further complicated in addition that crime is reported. Newspapers often sensationalise crime to be able to increase circulation and this makes objective discussion more difficult. This essay will firstly examine this topic by thinking about the arguments put forward by those who work in favour regarding the death penalty and then by looking at the arguments in opposition to the idea.

custom essay cheap

The key arguments in preference of restoring the death penalty are the ones of deterrence and retribution: the theory is the fact that people will be dissuaded from violent crime that they gave out to others if they know they will face the ultimate punishment and that people should face the same treatment. Statistics show that when the death penalty was temporarily withdrawn in Britain between 1965 and 1969 the murder rate increased by 125% (Clark, 2005). However, we need to look at the possibility that other reasons might have lead to this rise. Amnesty International (1996) claims that it is impractical to prove that capital punishment is a better deterrent than being given a full life sentence in prison and that “evidence….gives no support to your evidence hypothesis theory.” It seems at best that the deterrence theory is yet to be proven. The thought of ‘retribution’ is an interesting one: there is a appeal that is basic the simple phrase ‘the punishment should fit the crime’. Calder (2003) neatly summarises this argument when he says that killers give up their rights once they kill and therefore if punishments are too lenient then it shows that we undervalue the ability to live. There are various other points too to get the death penalty, one of these cost that is being. It is obviously far cheaper to execute prisoners promply rather than feed and house them for a long time on end.

The arguments against the death penalty are mainly ethical in their nature, that it is basically wrong to kill and therefore when the state kills it sends out the wrong message to your other countries in the country. Webber (2005) claims that the death penalty makes people genuinely believe that ‘killing people is morally permissable’. This might be an argument that is interesting could you teach children not to hit by hitting them? Wouldn’t this instead suggest to them that hitting was indeed ‘permissable’? There’s also the fact you could execute people that are innocent. Innocent people can always be released from prison, however they can never be cut back from the dead. When anyone have been killed there’s no potential for rehabilitation or criminals attempting to make up for crimes. Because of this reason capital punishment has been called ‘the bluntest of blunt instruments’ (Clark, 2005).

To conclude, the arguments put forward by those who support or are from the death penalty often reflect their deeper principles and beliefs. These beliefs and principles are deeply rooted in life experiences in addition to way individuals are brought up and tend to be unlikely to be swayed by clever arguments. It really is interesting that in this national country many people are in favour of the death penalty yet parliament continues to oppose it. In this instance it may be argued that parliament is leading the way in upholding human rights and continues to broadcast the message that is clear killing is obviously wrong.

You ought to be able to note that this essay is comprised of:

An introduction in three parts:
1. A sentence saying why the topic is intriguing and relevant.
2. A sentence (or two) mentioning the difficulties and issues active in the topic.
3. An outline associated with essay.

Main paragraphs with:
1. A subject sentence which provides a idea/argument that is main tells us what the whole paragraph is about.
2. Evidence from outside sources which support the argument(s) put forward in the topic sentence.
3. Some personal input from the author analysing the points put forward into the topic sentence additionally the outside sources.

A conclusion:
Summarises the points that are main gives a response towards the question.